This is a work in progress Please see additions and corrections at the bottom of this article
“Why are we raising the Town operating budget – padded with unnecessary items and pet projects – in a time when the electorate has asked for a reduction in their taxation? “
There were very few people at the Board of Finance’s Public Hearing last night (May 02) at the Middle School. From what I understand, there probably weren’t more than fifty people and most of them were town hall employees or members of various boards. The actual head count of the public attending probably wouldn’t have used up all of one’s fingers and toes.
In a general and quick perusal of the stack of handouts available at the back table of the meeting left me with lots of questions.
The first is confusing: Why are there TWO capital improvement schedules? One was on white paper (accompanied by a power point presentation) and the other on yellow paper. The white papered plan is titled the “CIP Management Plan – May 2006�. The yellow-papered plan is titled “Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan�, dated 05/02/06 Public Hearing. Everything on the ‘bond list’ of the white-papered plan is also on the yellow-papered plan. Ironically there are in the neighborhood of $1.8 Million dollars of items on the yellow-papered list that are not included on the formal presentation of the white-papered plan. What’s up with that??? There is no explanation accompanying these two items that would rectify the differences.
By the way, there is $350K for a Park and Recreation Soccer Field. On the white-papered plan it doesn’t note that this figure is only an estimate, as it does on the yellow-papered plan… which is where it is noted that this field is to be built at the Hawkins Road site. This site needs remediation, as determined three or four years ago by the previous Recreation Fields Committee. The $350K is not a real estimate, it’s a fantasy. Does anybody remember what remediation cost was quoted to us by the old committee? Read the rest of this entry »
