The responsibility of both our boards, as well as the developers, is to demonstrate concern for key environmental elements within any property they review- or submit- for development. Without any additional “honking” over the number of house lots proposed- to which most can agree “less is better”- the developer completely ignored the vernal pool in their proposal, and never provided information- nor allowed further study- to determine “scientifically” if any salamanders were actually utilizing the area. The IWWA and PZC boards – sorry Jeff – but dominated by Republicans – were in a rush to approve the Douglas proposal- rather than actually taking the necessary time and steps to consider these environmental features (which if not for citizens- would never have even been identified). My original post was simply pointing out the irony of the same Republicans (yes Jeff- I realize I am generalizing- rather than continually naming names- Dexter Young, Fred Rich- it just makes for shorter posts!) who ignored the original destruction of a “potentially important environmental area”- and now are jumping on this landowner. It just makes the Woodstock board seem like special interest, small minded group – intent on “payback”- rather than truly understanding the environmental impact of specific development. Read the rest of this entry »
