This is a re-post of a June 12, 2008 article in response to a comment by Con.
Mr. Foye justifies the need for more athletic fields because “students participating in athletics at the Academy equates to nearly 50% of the student population.” He also says that athletic participation is increasing the demand for more athletic fields. I took a look at his 50% participation number by counting the number of athletes listed for each team. I found that in the year ending 2006 there were 15 boys teams including JV teams and one freshman football team, and 16 girls teams including the cheerleaders. This is an impressive number of teams. There can be no question that the number of team players increased because of the advent of the football team. It’s often stated by the football booster club that having football provides a sports program for 80 students.
If you add up the number of boys listed on all of the boys teams, there appear to be 302 positions; for the girls there appear to be 262 positions. So there are as many as 564 positions on teams, close to Mr. Foye’s 50%. However, if you are familiar with the names on these teams, you see that there are quite a few players that are on two or three teams. I estimate that a third of the team slots are filled by multiple sports players. For example, you will find that most players on the boys and girls basketball teams are also on the soccer, cross-country, tennis, track, or softball and baseball teams; likewise, wrestlers will also be on the football team; and soccer players will also play multiple sports. The players on the Indoor Track team are probably the very same players that are on the Outdoor Track team with the exception of the shotput, javelin, and discus throwers who would break too many windows. Multi-sports athletes are found for the girls as well as the boys. If you take into account this one-third and subtract it from the 564 total positions, the actual number of students participating in sports is about 33% or about 376 (out of 1135 students), still a substantial number. But, of course, the Academy has established a pattern of inflating the numbers whether in scholarship or sports. At the bottom of this article I have placed a table listing the counted numbers of participants on each sports team.
The inference in Mr. Foye’s letter published earlier this week (an article below) is that 50% of the student population will benefit from the expansion of the athletic fields. Of course, this is not true. There are only about 80 (at most) football players between the varsity, JV, and freshman teams, or 7% of the student population.
The top picture (below) shows an aerial view of the current athletic fields. These fields contain a football field, a soccer field, a lacrosse field, a baseball field, a softball field, tennis courts, track team areas, and even a place to launch the shotput, javelin, or discus. So what’s missing? Read the rest of this entry »


























