from Con
I agree that a naked assertion that the storm ‘was not that bad’ on it’s own is not an argument, but I back that up with facts. Do you refute those ‘facts’ (that is, consider them suspect and not facts at all). The leaves on the trees were the only thing that made the storm out of the ordinary. We had at least 2 (and I think I remember more) storms last winter where more snow fell than this storm and the weather conditions during and more to the point after those storms were much more difficult than this storm – it was windy, below freezing, over a foot of snow on the ground, roads were lined with large snow banks, etc.
Conditions after this storm were pretty mild – temps were right back up in mid to high 40?s, there was little wind, no snow on the ground and it was partly sunny (sometimes mostly sunny). What about that comparison do you dispute? In what way was this storm so bad except for the leaves on the trees?
Regarding those leaves, the choice is NOT whether to spend the money to Trim adequately – yes it is expensive, but failure to do so is much more expensive as we have just seen. The expense of a 6-day power outage is not in Restoration alone and Restoration by itself was far more expensive than trimming would have been – but the loss of business revenue, all other financial losses incurred by residents because of 6 days with no power, those costs are astronomical taken in the aggregate. Read the rest of this entry »







