Woodstock CT Café

also serving Eastford, Pomfret, Brooklyn, Canterbury, Putnam, Ashford and Thompson. We’re as close as your mouse.
February 3rd, 2012

The Urban Myths about ‘Welfare Queens’ and Food Stamp Recipients

from Con

Too many Americans, when speaking about the poor engage this unique pattern of haughty superiority – they feel entitled to pass judgment on how they live, what they choose to buy (while saying how they love un-compromised Liberty) etc., “It’s my money they are spending on Lottery tickets!” is the cry. It’s often coupled with Romney’s attitude, taking his remark IN context, that current programs are absolutely adequate to live well and adequate to the task of not only keeping them treading water, but actually able to seize all the vast opportunities out there ‘if only they weren’t so lazy’ (another value judgment made only about the poor).

‘Just get out there and get a job!’ – there are 14 motivated, qualified candidates for every 3 jobs right now. No matter how you slice it, no matter that some can and do ‘pull themselves up by their bootstraps’ it is a mathematical certainty that some will not be able to do that.

Romney said he isn’t concerned because the current ‘Safety Net’ is adequate. This is the perception of those who don’t have to rely on it. Romney plans to cut those programs, yet he also said ‘and if the Safety Net is broken, I will fix it’ – that simple, huh! Wow, all of the problems of the poor can be summed up like that (and he will have no problem ‘fixing’ the so-called Safety Net can be achieve while at the same time slashing their budget?).

How many honest, motivated people do you know that live in Poverty. There are plenty of them, yet I have not heard them – those who absolutely know best, walk the walk, do not take advantage and are honest, decent people – I’ve never heard any of them deem it their prerogative to make value judgements about their fellow Americans, deciding what they do and do not deserve. How is it anyone’s business to pass judgment on the poor? Read the rest of this entry »

January 13th, 2012

Stem Cells in Medicine

Novel Stem Cell Treatment for Type I Diabetes.

from Jeff Gordon

As a Hematology-Oncology physician, caring for people with blood disorders, including malignant blood disorders, is what I do. The whole field of bone marrow, peripheral blood stem cell and cord blood transplantations is quite fascinating and has offered for many people the opportunities for either long-term control of their cancers or outright cures. It is not a panacea, however, and there are morbidities and moralities to consider. Not every person is a candidate for a transplant.

Hematopoietic cells in healthy adults come from the bone marrow. Before birth, the spleen and even the liver make such cells, but there is a shift from such soon after birth.

There are different types of levels of stem cells, some “uncommitted” to a defined hematopoietic pathway (such as to make white blood cells, red blood cells or megakaryocytes [these through a process of budding make platelets]) and some more committed.

There are a lot of internal processes in the bone marrow. It is an active organ system and since there is a lot of bone marrow in adults, it is a big organ system. I think technically the skin is the largest organ system. There is a lot of interesting processes outside of the bone marrow that interact with the bone marrow.

At a basic level, I have always found it a wonder that cytotoxic chemotherapy can be given at basically lethal dosing to blank out the bone marrow (and hopefully the malignant blood process as well) and that someone’s own (autologous) or someone else’s (allogenic) bone marrow or stem cells can be given via infusion and these cells know where to go, how to set up shop, and how to repopulate the marrow. Read the rest of this entry »

November 23rd, 2011

‘Synthetic’ Drugs of Abuse Can be Killers

Romeo Blackmer said: “…the use of the ‘Synthetic Marijuanas’ like K2 and “Spice” are being looked at by the DEA as possibly causing deaths. These chemical “copycats” of marijuana have contributed to recent deaths/suicides among users.”

From John

I put ‘synthetic’ in semi-quotes because this term can be a mis-nomer when the amateur chemist has no idea what he has synthesized.

No doubt many readers of this article have heard about the “frozen addicts” of Santa Cruz CA. Santa Cruz is about 25 miles southwest of the western edge of San Jose where I was once Scientific Director of the California Institute for Medical Research (CIMR) located behind Santa Clara Valley Hospital.

One of our investigators was Bill Langston, MD, an Associate Professor in the Department of Neurology at Stanford University, 15 miles up the San Francisco Bay penninsula next to Palo Alto where Becki and I lived in the 80s and 90s. You can find him on Google and Google images along with references to the 1980s PBS Nova production and the book on this interesting story.

Bill was the physician on duty at the back door emergency entrance across the street from CIMR. I used to enter the hospital through that back door quite often eight years later. Often I was met with a jolting shout out from a handcuffed and chained criminal lying on a gurney waiting for medical attention. Well,  one day, around 1980-81, Bill was there on duty when some very strange patients seeking attention staggered in.  Bill, a specialist in degenerative neurological diseases immediately recognized their symptoms as being like that of severe Parkinson’s disease. But these staggering patients were fairly young and after interviewing the people that brought them to the hospital, Bill learned that their symptoms came on very quickly. By contrast, Parkinson’s symptoms develop slowly but progressively over decades.

Bill quickly learned that these were heroin addicts that produced their own heroin and sold it on the streets of Santa Cruz. Like good chefs, though, they tasted their own product as a kind of ‘quality control’ before they distributed to others.

The police and Langston visited the home of the main Nobel honcho to see what they could find. What they found was a laboratory in the basement where the synthetic heroin was cooked up. They found pages ripped out of a chemistry journal that described the method for synthesis of synthetic heroin there in the lab. These pages led the investigators to visit Stanford’s Lane Medical Library on the center of the Stanford campus, a library where I spent many hours pursuing answers to my own scientific questions. The investigators went to the relevant journal issues and found that these pages had been torn out from these very issues.

I knew the chemist, Ian Irwin, who had determined the chemical structure of the compounds in this precious stash of heroin that was going to make these Santa Cruz ‘chemists’ rich. He found basicly two predominant compounds, one was heroin and the other was a compound eventually named MPTP. These two compounds were present at approximately 50:50 ratios.

Left to right: Ian, MPTP, and Heroin.

There’s an interesting picture of the crime scene in the basement lab where the ‘synthetic heroin’ had been made. A large wall thermometer in the picture read 90 degrees, too hot a temperature for optimal synthesis of synthetic heroin… but who’da thunk it.

After several years, Bill was able to explain the neurotoxicity of MPTP. Experiments on animal models sadly demonstrated that MPTP destroyed the substantia nigra of the lower part of the brain irreversibly. The substantia nigra is the site in the brain where a defect in dopamine metabolism causes Parkinson’s disease.

The only solution for these victims of their own greed and stupidity was a BRAIN TRANSPLANT! But no donors lined up.

November 6th, 2011

Baseball in the 1950s … and Andy Rooney

Reposted in memory of Andy Rooney, friend and neighbor in Rowayton CT

Last week (January 2011) the NY Times had a nostalgic article about the Polo Grounds where the New York Giants played in the 1950s before they moved to San Francisco. The article jogged my memory about the good old days when I was a kid growing up in Rowayton CT on Long Island Sound. I’ve been doing this reminiscing a lot over the last year as my parents spent their final days in our house. One of the great things my parents gave to me was their friends of their generation and sketchy stories about their early lives. I recollect the 1950s as the decade of my youth when nothing in life was complicated and there was a lot of fun to be had. My lone connection with the Polo Grounds was through one of their friends.

An important part of my life at that time was major league baseball from the beginning to the end of the 50s when my interest waned because of college. And besides, all of my favorite players had moved on or were about to. I was a devout Yankees fan and my best friend, Paul, was equally devoted to the Brooklyn Dodgers. Read the rest of this entry »

August 22nd, 2011

View of Healthcare Reform and Other Issues from a Local Civil Libertarian

Healthcare reform certainly is not all it could have been. It should have been single payer instead of moving away into the inferior individual mandate. But there are a ton of great things in that bill. Presently for the 40-50 million Americans who don’t have health insurance most of them are one moderate medical emergency away from financial ruin which in the long term is impacting all of us when we end up taking care of them. The plan also will end preexisting condition exemptions that feed into the above. It will also allow children to stay on their parent’s plans longer through the normal college and job search years. Of course, according to the CBO it does one of its most important objectives, it saves the US government money while providing broader coverage for Americans. It may not be perfect but there is a lot to like in there when you stop to look at it. You (db) asked what Democrats had done for us when they controlled everything, that’s it. When most of the provisions kick in in 2014 it will look very attractive.

You may not care about getting rid of “Don’t ask, don’t tell” but for civil libertarians like me it was a major event. So you ask why some of us support him, those things you don’t care about may very well be important to us. Civil rights issues are very important to me.

While we are talking about the wars, I do see a lot of drawdown of troops. It may not be at a pace everyone likes (either too slow or too fast) but there has been substantial movement in that area. Of course, he did get a major result in the “War on Terror” in that he ended up getting Bin Laden, more than he predecessor did and it’s hard to argue results.
Read the rest of this entry »

August 22nd, 2011

Mixing Population-Based (Health) Care With Market Controls

DBaker brought up his dissatisfaction with the new healthcare bill. I have to admit that I was very dissatisfied with the new law that does not go far enough. I read this interview of Jonathan Weiner (‘whiner’) over the weekend and thought his interview (published at his academic website) articulated well why managed healthcare needs to be universal. I spent 6 1/2 years as a postdoctoral fellow developing my cancer research program in the building directly behind Hopkins Hospital shown in the picture below. John

“When a young doctor or medical school dean tells me that in this country the market does what the market should do, and government should keep out of it, I tell them that’s fine, as long as they’re willing to return the million and a half dollars in federal and state subsidies for each doctor trained.” Jonathan Weiner, Noted Professor in Public Health, Blumberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University

Also see an article relating to Dr. Weiner’s program “Cutting the Costs of Care”.

“MANAGED CARE Reporter: You’ve done consulting work across Europe and Asia. What are some essential differences in how other developed countries approach health care compared to how we do things here?

JONATHAN WEINER: Other developed countries have come to two realizations that we have not come to. One is that it is immoral — or at best, amoral — not to provide health care to everybody if we believe that basic health care is a sign of a developed country. Taiwan has moved very rapidly to universal health care. Even mainland China acknowledges that as it gets more developed, it will need to provide health care for everybody. Recently, while a colleague from Germany was here, a tractor-trailer truck rolled up with what I think is Johns Hopkins’ 18th scanner. He asked how we can afford another MRI while people two blocks away don’t have health care. I told him I don’t know. The second realization is that other countries acknowledge that the collective — social insurance programs like the sickness funds of Germany, government agencies, or third parties that look very much like our insurance or managed care companies — cannot provide everything for everybody.

MC: So far, health care has been largely immune to global competition. Do you expect that to change?

WEINER: Yes, the health care system will become flat like the rest of the global economy. It’s true that patients can’t head overseas as readily as many jobs have. But increasingly, as things are digitized, American doctors, just like American corporations, will need to be careful. When it’s feasible — in areas like laboratory, pathology, radiology, reading EKGs — care will be delivered at the lowest-price, highest-quality point, regardless of geography. Medical tourism is also showing signs of growth. At least two insurers, Blue Cross of South Carolina and one of the southern California Blues are starting to cover people traveling abroad to get health care. For elective surgeries, some patients will gladly go to another country where a procedure is a third or a quarter of the cost here and the quality is as good or better.

MC: Is there some shared trait among countries or organizations that have embraced health information technology?

WEINER: Every advanced HIT (healthcare informatics)system I’ve studied — the British, Hong Kong, Kaiser Permanente, and Geisinger Health System in the U.S. — has a centralized rational entity that looks at the big picture and sees itself as being in this for the long haul. Hong Kong has probably the most sophisticated HIT system in the world. All of the nearly seven million Hong Kong residents have electronic medical records. We really are the laggards. Many well intentioned and ethical managed care executives from IPAs and PPOs just can’t make a business case for investing to bring physician office systems up to speed.
Read the rest of this entry »

August 20th, 2011

Rabid Rhetoric of the Republican Politicians

from Misha

“Do it because you think he’s the better man. I don’t see how you can do that now.”

Allow me to try then, Joe. You see, not once in the history of the American presidency has anyone been vilified and crucified by the GOP, right wingers and now, the Tea Partiers as much as President Obama has.

It began even before his inauguration, and has only increased since then. Lies and half truths are constantly pushed as facts. Even those who do not follow the minutiae of the issues, they would’ve seen it. So much so that, not only will Obama gets the support of Democrats, even the independents will vote for him once again.

I love how the GOP, Tea Partiers and right wingers love the heap accusations of incompetency, socialism, illegitimacy and now, treason, but never going all the way to actually try to impeach him. DO you know why? Because it’s all lies, and Obama will appear the better man at the end of it.

For the record though, since this is something the ignorant always seems to talk about:
(i) The federal stimulus was a measure agreed upon by the outgoing administration of Bush and the incoming one of Obama. It was seen as the only way to prevent a disastrous depression.
(ii) The 2009 deficit largely attributed to Obama is actually signed under Bush the previous year.
(iii) The debt-ceiling fiasco of last month was actually centered on the repayment of expenses made in 2010-2011, under a budget already approved by hypocrites like Bachmann. The Tea Party attempt to portray the debt-ceiling as a future expense was dishonest and a lot of ignorant people bought it.

(iv) Job figures have been steadily improving the past 18 months, and the number of jobs generated by the Obama administration in its first two years are actually more than what the Bush administration created in eight years. The only reason why unemployment remains so high is because the sub-prime banking crisis nearly toppled the American economy. 17 trillion were wiped off the citizen’s private wealth. That was how bad it it. Even during the The Great Depression of the 1930?s, only an equivalent of, vis-a-vis to GDP, $6 trillion disappeared from the economy.

Sometimes I think this all these attacks on Obama is just a combination of payback for the way Bush was criticised in the media and in some segments, racism.

It would be a good idea if the electorate actually stop listening to the rabid rhetoric of the politicians and actually investigate the truth for themselves. I always find reading COngressional records and the CBO as particularly enlightening to see the duplicity and integrity of a politician, as well as understanding the issues first hand.

So yeah Joe, I would vote for him again. And please, Reverend Wright screwed himself massively and paid for it – Obama has never even came close to him since then. If you want to play historical assumptions, then what about Perry and Bachmann? I cringe just thinking of it.

August 16th, 2011

Republicans! Who Do You Back?

A. Sarah Palin (Ms. Crosshairs)
B. Michele Bachmann (Happy Birthday Elvis)
C. Rick Perry (Mr. Secession)
D. Mitt Romney (author of RomneyCare)
E. Ron Paul (forthright)
F. Newt Gingrich ( :-) )
G. Jon Huntsman (maybe, but a Latter Day Saint)
H. Herman Cain (very Able)
I. Jon Greenspon (Jeffersonian Republican, social conservative)
J. Gerry Johnson (former Gov of New Mexico)
K. Fred Karger (Gay Rights activist)
L. Andy Martin (Birther)
M. Thad McCarter (Rep. from Michigan)
N. Paul Ryan (Representative Wisconsin)
O. Jimmy McMillen (Rent-is-too-damn-high party, running as a Repub)
P. Roy Moore (former Chief Justice of Alabama Supreme Court)
Q. Buddy Roemer (form Gov. of LA)
R. Rick Santorum (former US Senator from PA, put out of office Tea Party)
S. Vern Wuensche (businessman)
T. Bring Back any George Bush
U. Chris Christie (sort of fat)
V. Other.

These candidates are summarized and compared at http://2012.republican-candidates.org/

Almost in order A through U left to right and down. Does it really matter?

Does anyone see a winner here?

August 15th, 2011

Food For Thought Given the Confusing Political Stances on Our Economy by Our Current Candidates for President

“Social reform is not to be secured by noise and shouting, by complaints and denunciation, by the formation of parties, or the making of revolutions, but by the awakening of thought and the progress of ideas. Until there be correct thought, there cannot be right action, and when there is correct thought, right action will follow.” – Social Problems, 1886 http://www.henrygeorgeschool.org/theschool.htm .
The following essay is taken from http://www.landandfreedom.org/ushistory/us19.htm .

Deficit spending — when more is spent by the government than is collected in taxes — has frequently been a policy of the U.S. government. Alexander Hamilton, Secretary of Treasury under President Washington, promoted the policy of incurring debts as a method of establishing sound credit. Many succeeding administrations followed suit. However, debts were incurred mainly as a result of wars, and periods of postwar prosperity made them easy to erase. Government debts had not been used to attempt to improve peacetime economic conditions. As a result of the Great Depression, however, a new era was ushered in — an era in which fiscal policy included government borrowing aimed specifically at lessening the effects of the depression.

In campaigning for the presidency in 1932, Franklin D. Roosevelt promised the American public that a balanced budget would be maintained. In fact, during all his years in the White House, prior to our buildup for World War II, a balanced budget was uppermost in his mind. Philosophically, he was against the government’s going further into debt — but, in order to support his many relief programs, his advisors felt that it was necessary to spend more. As program after program was passed — programs that would cost taxpayers billions of dollars — the choices were increased taxes or government borrowing. So, to give the American people a “New Deal,” a budget deficit was needed.

When he first took over the presidency, Roosevelt had the backing of many segments of society — not only the general public but bankers and businessmen. The depression affected everyone. Business was hurt badly; government borrowing was far more acceptable to the business community than higher taxes. Such was the attitude until 1936, when bankers and businessmen began to change their views. As recovery began to take effect, the deficit was not considered necessary. Even though he did not favor greater debt, Roosevelt had his priorities. Convinced that deficits were temporary and not a permanent fact of fiscal life, he was exultant about the pump-priming consequences of spending. In his budget message of 1936 he stated:

“Our policy is succeeding. The figures prove it Secure in the knowledge that steadily decreasing deficits will turn in time into steadily increasing surpluses, and that it is the deficit of today which is making possible the surplus of tomorrow, let us pursue the course we have mapped.”

As unemployment decreased during those early years of pump-priming, there seemed to be some grounds for President Roosevelt’s optimism. Then, one year after his second inauguration, unemployment began to rise. Why, in spite of this pump priming, was there a recession within a depression? The pump was not running; prosperity generated by deficits had not survived the withdrawal of the stimulus. Were deficits to become a permanent part of government policy? Read the rest of this entry »

August 10th, 2011

Lisa Schrader Wins Big! Congrats Lisa from the Cafe

from http://jbcupcakechallenge.com/

Reminder article

August 5th, 2011

S&P Downgrades USA credit rating to AA+ (as of 8:35 PM Sat. 8/5)

This is what happens when people who are suppose to be serving our interests serve their own. Any bets how the market will react come Monday… oh wait, it’ll start late Sunday afternoon!

August 3rd, 2011

The Final Speech Yesterday at the Capital

Congressman Otter (R): Ladies and gentlemen, I’ll be brief. The issue here is not whether we broke a few rules, or took a few liberties with our constituencies and the economy – we did!

[winks at Speaker Wormer]

Congressman Otter: But you can’t hold a whole Congress responsible for the behavior of a few, sick twisted individuals. For if you do, then shouldn’t we blame the whole government system? And if the whole government system is guilty, then isn’t this an indictment of our society in general? I put it to you, Mr. President – isn’t this an indictment of our entire American society? Well, you can do whatever you want to us, but we’re not going to sit here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America. Gentlemen!

[Congress then adjourns until the month of September]

August 2nd, 2011

How the Senate Voted

It is clear from these votes that the moderate Republicans and Democrats could have come together a long time ago without manufacturing a crisis. Instead, Boehner was bamboozled by the Tea Party and was solely focused on preserving his Speakership. He is now viewed to be vulnerable unless he kisses you-know-what. It will be interesting to see what comes about over the next 15 months.

YES Votes (74)     NO Votes (26)  
Member Party State   Member Party State
Daniel K. Akaka D HI   Kelly Ayotte R NH
Lamar Alexander R TN   Saxby Chambliss R GA
John Barrasso R WY   Daniel Coats R IN
Max Baucus D MT   Tom Coburn R OK
Mark Begich D AK   Jim DeMint R SC
Michael Bennet D CO   Kirsten Gillibrand D NY
Jeff Bingaman D NM   Lindsey Graham R SC
Richard Blumenthal D CT   Charles E. Grassley R IA
Roy Blunt R MO   Tom Harkin D IA
John Boozman R AR   Orrin G. Hatch R UT
Barbara Boxer D CA   Dean Heller R NV
Scott Brown R MA   James M. Inhofe R OK
Sherrod Brown D OH   Ron Johnson R WI
Richard M. Burr R NC   Frank R. Lautenberg D NJ
Maria Cantwell D WA   Mike Lee R UT
Benjamin L. Cardin D MD   Robert Menendez D NJ
Thomas R. Carper D DE   Jeff Merkley D OR
Bob Casey D PA   Jerry Moran R KS
Thad Cochran R MS   Ben Nelson D NE
Susan Collins R ME   Rand Paul R KY
Kent Conrad D ND   Marco Rubio R FL
Christopher A. Coons D DE   Bernard Sanders I VT
Bob Corker R TN   Jeff Sessions R AL
John Cornyn R TX   Richard C. Shelby R AL
Michael D. Crapo R ID   Patrick J. Toomey R PA
Richard J. Durbin D IL   David Vitter R LA
Michael B. Enzi R WY         Read the rest of this entry »
August 2nd, 2011

How the House Voted

Joe Courtney and Jim Himes voted YES and Rosa DeLauro, Chris Murphy, and John Larsen voted NO. All are Democrats. It became obvious that leadership of both parties managed the voting by approving or disapproving NO votes.

66 Republicans voted NO (about the number of Tea Party faithful) and 95 Democrats voted NO. 174 Republicans voted YES and 95 Democrats voted YES.

From USAToday: “So what was its reaction when the House passed a deal Monday night that would raise the debt ceiling in exchange for deficit reductions of more than $2 trillion without tax increases?

‘Political suicide,’ according to Tea Party Nation founder Judson Phillips. Tea Party Patriots co-founder Jenny Beth Martin said the deal was ‘destroying America’s future.’

Sen. Rand Paul, a freshman Republican from Kentucky who co-founded the Senate Tea Party Caucus, argued that the deal never balances the budget and lamented that it did not contain a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution. Rep. Paul Broun, a Republican from Georgia who has been embraced by the Tea Party, even proposed lowering the debt ceiling to rein in federal spending.”

House Representative House Rep. Voting Yes (269) House Rep. Voting No (161)
Sandra Adams R FL-24   Gary L. Ackerman D NY-5
Robert B. Aderholt R AL-4   Todd Akin R MO-2
Rodney Alexander R LA-5   Justin Amash R MI-3
Jason Altmire D PA-4   Michele Bachmann R MN-6
Robert E. Andrews D NJ-1   Tammy Baldwin D WI-2
Steve Austria R OH-7   Xavier Becerra D CA-31
Spencer Bachus R AL-6   Rob Bishop R UT-1
Lou Barletta R PA-11   Earl Blumenauer D OR-3
John Barrow D GA-12   Leonard L. Boswell D IA-3
Roscoe G. Bartlett R MD-6   Bruce Braley D IA-1
Joe L. Barton R TX-6   Mo Brooks R AL-5
Charles F. Bass R NH-2   Paul Broun R GA-10
Karen Bass D CA-33   Corrine Brown D FL-3
Dan Benishek R MI-1   Ann Marie Buerkle R NY-25
Rick Berg R ND-1   Dan Burton R IN-5
Shelley Berkley D NV-1   G. K. Butterfield D NC-1
Howard L. Berman D CA-28   Michael E. Capuano D MA-8
Judy Biggert R IL-13   Dennis Cardoza D CA-18
Brian P. Bilbray R CA-50   André Carson D IN-7
Gus Bilirakis R FL-9   Jason Chaffetz R UT-3
Timothy H. Bishop D NY-1   Judy Chu D CA-32
Sanford D. Bishop Jr. D GA-2   Hansen Clarke D MI-13
Diane Black R TN-6   Yvette D. Clarke D NY-11
Marsha Blackburn R TN-7   Emanuel Cleaver II D MO-5
John A. Boehner R OH-8   Steve Cohen D TN-9
Jo Bonner R AL-1   John Conyers Jr. D MI-14
Mary Bono Mack R CA-45   Chip Cravaack R MN-8
Dan Boren D OK-2   Joseph Crowley D NY-7
Charles Boustany Jr. R LA-7   Elijah E. Cummings D MD-7
Kevin Brady R TX-8   Geoff Davis R KY-4
Robert A. Brady D PA-1   Peter A. DeFazio D OR-4
Vern Buchanan R FL-13   Diana DeGette D CO-1
Larry Bucshon R IN-8   Rosa DeLauro D CT-3
Michael C. Burgess R TX-26   Scott DesJarlais R TN-4
Ken Calvert R CA-44   Mike Doyle D PA-14
Dave Camp R MI-4   Jeffrey Duncan R SC-3
John Campbell R CA-48   Donna Edwards D MD-4
Francisco Canseco R TX-23   Keith Ellison D MN-5
Eric Cantor R VA-7   Eliot L. Engel D NY-17
Shelley Moore Capito R WV-2   Sam Farr D CA-17
Lois Capps D CA-23   Bob Filner D CA-51
Russ Carnahan D MO-3   Jeff Flake R AZ-6
John Carney D DE-1   Chuck Fleischmann R TN-3
John Carter R TX-31   John Fleming R LA-4
Bill Cassidy R LA-6   J. Randy Forbes R VA-4
Kathy Castor D FL-11   Barney Frank D MA-4
Steven J. Chabot R OH-1   Trent Franks R AZ-2
Ben Chandler D KY-6   Marcia L. Fudge D OH-11
David Cicilline D RI-1   Scott Garrett R NJ-5
William Lacy Clay D MO-1   Phil Gingrey R GA-11
James E. Clyburn D SC-6   Louie Gohmert R TX-1
Howard Coble R NC-6   Charlie Gonzalez D TX-20
Mike Coffman R CO-6   Trey Gowdy R SC-4
Tom Cole R OK-4   Tom Graves R GA-9
K. Michael Conaway R TX-11   Al Green D TX-9
Gerald E. Connolly D VA-11   Morgan Griffith R VA-9
Jim Cooper D TN-5   Raúl M. Grijalva D AZ-7
Jim Costa D CA-20   Janice Hahn D CA-36
Jerry F. Costello D IL-12   Ralph M. Hall R TX-4
Joe Courtney D CT-2   Andy Harris R MD-1
Rick Crawford R AR-1   Vicky Hartzler R MO-4
Ander Crenshaw R FL-4   Alcee L. Hastings D FL-23
Mark Critz D PA-12   Rush Holt D NJ-12 Read the rest of this entry »
July 30th, 2011

Deep Kimchi

from Kevin

To think we are in worse shape than we were two years ago I’m not sure reflects reality well (addressing Newcomer). Two years ago we were in free fall and today we are at least stabilized in no small part due to TARP and ARRA. I can tell you that this community, along with communities across the country, directly benefited from those programs and there would have been layoffs if they were not in place. Layoffs would have continued the downward spiral as it would have added to the pool of people who now can’t pay their bills, stop buying things and need public assistance as well. A lot of people seem to think that the government can snap its fingers and everything will be OK again. That’s not the reality of what governments can do.

When we were entering the recession a lot of depression era economics experts talked about the government and stimulus programs. One of the largest mistakes that happened then was that everyone started getting freaked out about the debt the depression and stimulus programs were causing and started pulling back into austerity programs. Of course this led to laying off government workers which began the downward spiral again. That’s when the depression started getting really bad. Unfortunately we’ve forgotten all that and are heading down the same path.

So is the economy getting any better? No of course not and the government is no longer doing anything to improve it. Even worse, the government through austerity programs is actively working to restart the downward spiral. Now I ask you, why do you think this is occurring?

Here’s what I’m unhappy with President Obama about. He is so concerned with bringing the other side to the table that again and again he capitulates so much as to not create a balanced approach. The Republicans are currently in a great place and can’t lose. They get their way and get to blame the bad results on the President. For example, in order to get some grudging Republican votes, the stimulus was too small and a third of that, tax cuts that ended up stimulating nothing and making the debt higher. When that didn’t do enough to stimulate the economy and caused deeper debt the Republicans get to blame him for it. Healthcare reform ended with a Republican plan, an individual mandate to try and get a few of them on board. Of course, now that’s the part everyone hates and the Republicans get to tar President Obama for it and claim they had nothing to do with it. Now we have the worst and most damaging thing of all about to happen. All attempts at government recovery have stopped and the Tea Party is about to set the agenda. President Obama is once again going over and talking big cuts with them to compromise instead of talking about ways to recover. Even if the debt ceiling is increased, but it is tied to massive cuts, we are in deep kimchi. When the layoffs that that will cause hit the economy we can kiss this fragile recovery good bye. The great news for Republicans is they will be able to once again point their fingers at President Obama as the cause. The Republicans win, likely gain power and who loses? Oh yes, the American people.

There is one way from a policy perspective to fix our financial situation and that is to move our GDP in a positive trajectory. The unemployment problem recedes, the debt problem corrects itself, etc. To be honest the 14th amendment solution might be the best outcome of this mess. At least that won’t cause damaging cuts. The best outcome would have been for congress to raise the debt limit and start focusing on jobs but that isn’t going to happen. Instead they are focused on not raising the debt limit and creating more layoffs which will surely put us back into a recession. A sad, sad, situation.

Thanks,

Kevin

Next Entries »